Labour retained Dumbarton for Jackie Baillie MSP despite being dwarfed by the SNP’s efforts to unseat her on all fronts, campaign figures have revealed.
The SNP spent 57 per cent more overall to win the Scottish Parliament constituency in May. That included more than 207,000 SNP leaflet inserts, survey cards, newsletters and letters for Nationalist candidate Toni Giugliano compared to nearly 120,000 for Ms Baillie – that’s 73 per cent more printed material.
But digital advertising was even more stark. Labour’s campaign spent £991.03 on Facebook ads.
But the SNP spent £4,387.80 on near daily Facebook ads from January until polling day on May 6. That’s 342 per cent more and is more than all other candidates in Dumbarton or Clydebank constituencies combined.
The SNP also tried trackside advertising with Dumbarton FC for £420 on top of signs, posters and a promotional video.
Despite the weight of the SNP to remove Ms Baillie after her previous five electoral wins, she was returned by voters with an increased majority.
The SNP also increased its vote by 2.6 per cent to 16,342, while Labour won an extra 6.1 per cent to get 17,825 votes.
The Tories, who spent £11,943.32 on candidate Maurice Corry, were down 6.3 per cent to 3,205 votes.
Scottish Libertarian Party candidate Jonathan Rainey spent £332.70, the least in the campaign.
More than £12,000 in permissible donations were made to Ms Baillie’s campaign, largely from the Dumbarton branch of the party. By contrast, the £3,300 in listed donations to Mr Giugliano came from 17 Individuals offering amounts from £60 to £500 and from across Dumbarton and the Vale as well as Milngavie, Helensburgh, Rutherglen and Edinburgh.
Dumbarton was one of the most hotly contested battlegrounds in the country, but it was also expensive. In total, seven candidates spent a total of £69,074.09, more than £1 per voter with an electorate of more than 55,000.
Neighbouring Clydebank and Milngavie candidates spent a total of £49,333.22.
Individual spending doesn’t reflect free social media posts or any national media attention or outside groups backing particular candidates or tactical voting. After their defeat, the SNP said Ms Baillie won because of tactical voting by Tory supporters.
Mr Giugliano told the Reporter: “I’m hugely proud of my campaign which, in just four months, secured the highest SNP share of the vote ever recorded in the Dumbarton constituency – that’s almost 3,000 more votes than 2016.
“I’m also proud that my campaign efforts secured a commitment in the SNP manifesto to refurbish the Vale of Leven Hospital - and I hope this commitment is delivered promptly.
“The campaign strategy was designed to get the SNP vote out on the day – and we did that. But there are some things in politics that you can’t control – such as the Tories effectively standing aside to give Labour a free run.
“On election night I was knocking up voters in Brucehill and Castlehill who voted SNP in their droves – while my Labour opponent spent her time at Victoria Halls in Helensburgh courting the Tory vote – that tells its own story."
He added: “The bigger question is – who funded the ‘vote tactically’ propaganda on lampposts, roundabouts and social media all over Dumbarton? How much was spent locally and what can be done to limit non-party election spending in the future?”
Mr Giugliano’s campaign manager, Helensburgh and Lomond South Councillor Richard Trail, a councillor for Helensburgh and Lomond South, said: “Toni fought a good campaign in a very unusual election campaign. He had an uphill battle to raise his profile when for much of the campaign he could not engage with voters personally.
“The Labour candidate was successful in wooing large numbers of Tory voters to her cause which tipped the result her way.”
Ms Baillie said: “I won my seat, with an increased majority, because I didn’t take a single vote for granted.
“My team and I pounded the streets day in and day out and hit the telephones in order to have meaningful, one-on-one conversations with voters in every part of our community.
“I listened to what they wanted – and what they told me was that they wanted to prioritise a recovery over another referendum, they wanted an alternative to 14 years of the SNP and they wanted someone who was local and would fight their corner.
“The Scottish Labour Party hired a west of Scotland regional campaign organiser who I was lucky enough to have join me on the campaign trail for part of their time. Their job was to mobilise and support volunteers who were a huge part of the campaign.
“I know that the way that we campaign today could not be more different from the way I campaigned when I first won my seat back in 1999.
“But I still strongly believe in the power of face-to-face conversations. Voters want to know who they are voting for.
“Social media has been really effective in getting a message across, especially during the pandemic, but it is no substitute for the personal touch. That’s why I spent my time and money knocking thousands of doors, delivering leaflets and writing letters to voters to help connect with them on a far more personal level.
“I am incredibly proud of the campaign that I ran. Representing my community is the honour of my life and I am forever grateful to the voters of Dumbarton, the Vale of Leven, and Helensburgh and Lomond for re-electing me.”
All candidates have legal limits set by the Electoral Commission and must file expenses in the weeks following the vote.
A “long campaign” begins on January 6 and runs until the day a person becomes a candidate. The “short campaign” starts the next day and ends on polling day, May 6.
The limits this year were £21,500 plus 6.3p per elector for the long campaign, £8,700 plus 9p per elector on the short campaign.
The number of potential voters can be a provisional number in March before a final one, causing differences in the calculated potential limit of spending.
But this year, across seven candidates for Dumbarton, there were six different upper limits. One, independent candidate James Morrison, didn’t submit an upper limit at all.
All seven candidates were below the upper limits, which they legally cannot breach.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here