An MSP has said he is glad about the arrangements for the public meeting which will make a decision on the planning application for 'Lomond Banks'.
Ross Greer, MSP for West Scotland, has announced he is happy with the arrangements over the proceeding for a public meeting to be held on September 16 that will decide on the controversial planning application submitted by Flamingo Land Ltd.
Greer has welcomed the news that adequate time will be given to those opposing the mega-resort plans at a public hearing.
Mr Greer says he has previously raised concerns with the park and Scottish Government that the normal format of park board meetings, which he claims would have given objectors to the proposals other than the community council just five minutes in total to speak, would be unacceptable for such a high profile hearing.
READ MORE: Processes revealed for how controversial Flamingo Land decision will be reached
In terms of processes for a decision anyone, or any organisation, that has submitted a formal representation on the application directly to the National Park Authority, will be notified by email or letter [in line with how their formal representation was submitted to the National Park Authority] and given details on how they can request to speak at the hearing on September 16.
The proposals for a luxury resort on the banks of Loch Lomond at Balloch are the most objected-to plans in Scottish history
Ross Greer said: "I'm glad the National Park has decided to suspend its standing orders and allow for the substantial debate clearly required for a proposal as destructive as Flamingo Land.
"The long list of reasons for rejecting this mega-resort include the flood risk, more than 250 additional cars on congested local roads at peak times, damage to local wildlife and risk to existing local businesses. It is only right that every one of these points is given enough time to be carefully weighed up against Flamingo Land's spin. We will now arrange for our full team of experts, legal advisors and local residents to present a comprehensive case against these daft plans.
“The decision to livestream proceedings is also a big improvement on the proposed 2019 hearing and will boost public confidence that this decision is being taken in an open and transparent manner. The National Park has been given a difficult task, and I appreciate the work they are putting into ensuring the public's voice will be heard at what is probably the most high-profile planning hearing in Scottish history.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here